Casa Circondariale Livorno - Le Sughere Prison
The Le Sughere prison, built in 1984, is located on the outskirts of Livorno. Currently there is only the male section. Inside, some activities are carried out such as theater, sports, reading courses, literacy school courses and vocational secondary schools, IT and languages. The scarce availability of a large common space - such as a projection room or a theater - limits the development of social and cultural activities intended to support the educational treatment.
Knowledge and culture are seemed as essential elements of a process of reworking the negative choices of the past and a cornerstoen towards the construction of new existential scenarios.
Guido Ricci
Clinical Psychologist and Community
Psychotherapist
Vice President Linc scs Onlus
We were very well taken care of by the hosts in Livorno and we started with a dinner together on Sunday night where the final details of Monday's program were determined. Then we met the director of the prison, the head of security, the head of content, the head of l.i.n.c, and representatives of the school. They had a good and informative presentation about how the prison system worked in general in Italy and what offers they had in Livorno.
It was interesting to see how the prison was organized. There were 230 prisoners there and approx. 150 employees. The guards were trained from the police academy and were Polizia for prison. The prisons in Italy were divided into low security, medium security and high security. This prison was medium security. Organized crime went to high security. Young criminals were screened for imprisonment and society tried to find other solutions for the execution of sentences. 60% of the inmates were between 26 and 45 years old. It had often been a long time (eg 5 - 10 years) between crime and imprisonment.
About content. They had course activities and various programs. The school for prisoners offered both vocational subjects and common subjects. Examples were gardening, construction workers, etc. Some inmates were also cleared to work outside during the day, while serving time in prison for the rest of the time.
On the digital side, there were computers for teachers but no internet for students. But through the teachers, 17 inmates were connected to the University of Pisa and were allowed to study remotely there. During the corona epidemic, "skype" conversations were introduced between inmates and their families. This project has been a success and the prison is considering continuing this.
The prison also had a ward on the island of Gorgona. In this prison were inmates who had been in priosons for a long time and they got jobs as winemakers on this island.
House of Detention Elba
The Fort dates back to the XVII century, when the Port of Longone was under Spanish dominion. Work was started in 1603, under the guidance of the viceroy of Naples Giovanni Alfonso Pimentel de Herrera, with the aim of streghthening the defence system already in force and hence gaining better control over the sea traffic.
For all of the XVII and XVIII centuries, the fort underwent numerous sackages on behalf of the powers at war against Spain, considered a threat from the beginning.
In 1814, when Napoleon landed in Elba, some rooms in the fort were lent to the Emperor for him to use while he stayed there, and that he then kept as third residence after Villa dei Mulini and the Villa in San Martino.
Towards the end of the year 1800, Fort Longone finally became a defence building and aquired strategic importance. The local administrators requested and obtained permission for the buildng to be turned into a prison, something that proved to be an excellent source of work at a time when those living in Porto Longone were going through a severe economical crisis.
The prison however soon became famous for terrible living conditions of the prisoners, giving it the name of one the worst prisons in Italy. One of the reasons was that the prison was overcrowded. In the 90s, there were approx. 500 prisoners there, while there are now approx. 230 inmates. So things greatly improved as the years went by.
The fort is still a prison today, and despite the fact that the seventeenth century Church dedicated to Saint James the Great, an excellent exampe of Baroque art, is inside the structure.
Experiences:
We were well received by our hosts on Elba from l.i.n.c, Lucrezia Ferra and Rachele Neri . They first organized a reception with the head of security, the head of the school, the head of content and several prison staff. There we were presented with general information about the prison.
Then we were given a tour of the prison. First we visited a prison ward on 4 floors where we met inmates and guards. There, the doors to the community were open all day.
Then we got to see the school department. On the Ict field, inmates did not have access to the internet. But they had teaching in several subjects and they had a well-developed system for distance learning. Lucrezia from l.i.n.c had also completed several projects in this prison on distance learning.
Furthermore, we were given a tour of several of their workshops. In particular, it made an impression to see that the prison participated in the production of an Italian design bag production.
The prison also operated with agro production and delivered vegetables to hotels, restaurants etc.
In generall we from Norway were impressed by projects run by the prisons and it was especially interesting to hear about the prison system's ties to professional actors such as wine producers, design bag production, etc.
Also, it seems like a common challenge for many countries to give inmates access to the internet and expanded data usage. But this prisons' use of distance learning was impressive and the use of this was developed comered to Norway.
The world is changing but do the justice department, and the schools in prison, follow up!?
We often talk about the importance of digital competence. In Norway almost every public document is delivered in a form for digitized document, and in the curriculum digital competence is pointed out as a key competence to succeed in learning and in living in the society of today. Firstly it has to be said that the employees in the prison told us that not all public document in Italy was digitized, but you could assume that in some years it will be like that in Italy as well.
In Italy we visited two prisons, both of them did use some digitized aids to keep in contact with the society outside prison in form of videocalls to family and relatives. In this way the inmates learn that this is a possibility to interact with others, but since the inmates aren’t allowed to touch the tablet/smartphone you cannot say that the inmates are building digital competence in this way.
In the two prisons we learned about two very different prison schools. The prison in Livorno recently bought two computers to use in the school, but for now they haven’t been able to use them since they are not functionable in the prison!?
In the prison on Elba they had a big smartboard/interactive board in every classroom, and in the close-down due the covid virus they had been using distance learning. They had sound and camera both ways so the students could interact with their teachers. (This is more than we can do in Norway, since we don’t have camera out of the prison through DFS, the prison ICT system for school.)
Anyhow the use of distance learning, which is a good thing for the inmates considering the alternative, probably won’t build any digital competence for the inmates either.
When we asked if the inmates had a computer to do their school assignments the answer was short and clear; “No, no, no, no!” When asking a teacher about this, she answered: “Don’t make me laugh!”
It seems to be same in Italy as it is in Norway, the school would like to have more access to computers fore the inmates, but the justice department/the local prison is concerned about it. Why is the computer a threat to the prison society when it is considered a help and a must have outside? And if the inmates have limited or no access to computers, how should they develop digital competence to measure up to what they need when they are released?
The visit in Italy didn’t give and answer on how inmates could build digital competence, but it did show that we are more alike in they way we try to help inmates get a new life. Also in Italy they try to make them more ready for coping a work, both in formal education, work training but also in working with health issues that could limited the chance of getting a job. They had many possibilities as long as the work didn’t involve a computer.
Could you be a part of society without access to a computer? In the prison society absolutely, but in society outside it’s more questionable. When we wanted to learn more about “digital competence in European prisons and citizenship”, we wanted to see how we could prepare inmates to cope the digital society outside prisons as well. So far inmates in Norwegian prisons have some possibilities they don’t have in Italy, but still that’s limited.
At the moment it seems to be necessary for the school to think outside the box but within prison regulations, to give the inmates a little bit of the digital competence they will need when they are released. For instance, in form of dummy programs who don’t interact, but could give some references on how to do different digital tasks you need to do in daily living.
We might not find all answers in Italy, but we learned a lot about citizenship in another European country, and we learned that when it comes to content in prison, we aim for the same; to give the inmates a better chance of a new life through school and/or work.
We will investigate further, and therefore we say: to be continued…